Natural Resources and Energy

Product

BGP Litigation is specialises in comprehensive services for the oil, gas and energy sectors. The firm's lawyers have accumulated years of experience in providing legal support to clients in these industries and demonstrate deep sector-specific expertise.

BGP Litigation assists global energy market leaders, state-owned oil and gas corporations, oilfield services holdings, regional energy companies and businesses developing innovative fuel technologies in finding effective solutions to emerging legal challenges.

The firm's lawyers provide legal support for the day-to-day operations of national and international oil and gas companies across various jurisdictions. This includes assistance with dispute resolution, antitrust regulation, tax issues, lawmaking and managing risks associated with ensuring deal execution. Our work encompasses complex disputes, arbitration proceedings, transaction approvals with the Federal Antimonopoly Service (FAS), the Russian Government Commission for Control of Foreign Investment and defence of client interests in cases of contractual non-performance due to sanctions restrictions.

We advised:

A Major Construction Company

on sale of 100% of the shares in the authorised capital of two gas production companies

A Russian Contractor

in a dispute with a foreign counterparty in connection with construction of a Nord Stream section (ICC rules)

A Confidential Client

with public ownership on issues related to the EU sanctions regime with respect to the Russian oil and gas sector, including work with foreign assets, intra-group financing, risks of secondary sanctions, personal liability of individual officials and risks of participating in transactions of foreign financial institutions

A Russian Petroleum Company

on approval by FAS Russia of six parallel asset purchase transactions, including preparation of written and verbal opinions on the situation on relevant commodity markets and potential impact on competition

An Oil and Gas Production Company

in a dispute with a supplier of expensive plant for purification of formation (oil) water on the largest deposit of high-viscosity oil over termination of the agreement for supply of the plant, recovery of funds for the goods and penalties in connection with poor performance of its work

A Russian Exploration Company

with public ownership in the LCIA in connection with a dispute with an equipment supplier, where the plaintiff sought to involve the Russian Federation as a party to the dispute

A Major Russian Private Energy Company

in a dispute over recovery of damages in connection with improper performance by the contractor (a wholly owned subsidiary of a foreign company) of work to repair two gas turbine units, including drafting a statement of claim and developing a strategy, including on the issue of competence of a Russian court to consider the dispute

A Russian Oil Company

during interaction with an antimonopoly authority on several mergers and acquisitions in relation to core and non-core assets of strategic importance for national security, as they increased the market share of strategically important companies, including analysis of several parallel markets: drilling, oilfield and downhole pumping equipment

A Russian Oil Company

as part of an on-site tax audit and assessment of criminal risks of a subsidiary, including analysis of tax audit materials and an appeal against illegal actions on the part of tax inspectorate employees

A Russian Petrochemical Company

in a dispute with an English buyer over refusal to pay a debt for delivered goods due to sanctions risks

A Major Private Oil Company

in a dispute over ownership of a marine vessel owned by the client, including drafting a claim for interim measures and a motion to reinstate a missed procedural deadline for appealing a previous court decision issued without the client's participation

A Russian Oil Major

in three separate disputes over invalidation of transactions for performance of non-standard construction work in a geographically remote region, previously made with a major bankrupt construction company

A Russian Oil Major

in three separate disputes over invalidating transactions for performance of non-standard construction work in a geographically remote region, previously made with a major bankrupt construction company

Team

Dmitry Bazarov
Partner, partner committee member, attorney — Dispute Resolution, Bankruptcy
Pavel Kondukov
Partner, attorney — Tax Advise and Disputes, Lawmaking and GR
Valentina Semenova
Counsel, attorney — Tax Advise and Disputes
00

News

07/03/2026 07/03/2026 Press-release
06/09/2026 06/09/2026 Press-release
04/14/2026 04/14/2026 Press-release
BGP Litigation Secures Reversal of Appellate Ruling in a Dispute over Reclamation of Property from a Good-Faith Purchaser
BGP Litigation's Dispute Resolution team helped its client, Blago Ertil LLC, an agro-industrial company, secure a reversal of the appellate court ruling in a dispute over the reclamation of the value of several hundred tonnes of sunflower oilseeds stolen by fraudsters.

The dispute involved reclaiming the commodity value from a bona fide purchaser as unjust enrichment.  The cause of action was based on the circumstances of the loss of possession of the commodity by the original owner as a result of the fraud.  The appellate court, referring to the final and binding verdict in a criminal fraud case, concluded that the property had been withdrawn from the original owner's possession against his will and ruled that the defendant should pay the value of the commodity.

BGP Litigation's team joined the proceedings at the cassation appeal stage.  The lawyers revised the defence strategy, focusing on application of Article 302 of the Russian Civil Code.  Having taken the account of the current case law of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, our firm's dispute resolution practitioners substantiated the necessity of distinguishing between a disposal of property at an owner's will and a disposal against such will, even in case of a fraud.

In the cassation appeal, our dispute resolution professionals proved that in the case in question, the original owner had voluntarily performed the legally binding acts to transfer the commodity, for which reason the commodity had been withdrawn from his possession at his own will.

Following the review of the cassation appeal, the district commercial (arbitrazh) court reversed the appellate court's ruling and upheld the decision of the first instance court to reject the claim.

Our lawyers' position helped develop a precedent-setting approach to application of Article 302 of the Russian Civil Code.  The court upheld that a fraud conviction did not preclude the necessity of analysing the nature of the owner's intentions and the circumstances surrounding the property transfer.  Such an approach is essential for safeguarding bona fide purchasers and further development of the case law.

BGP Litigation's dispute resolution team engaged in the project comprised Partner Vladimir Efremov, Senior Associate Igor Vershinin, and Junior Associate Marfa Makarova.
07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03 04 05 06