Назад

Counterparties audit

Allegations made against a taxpayer of lack of due care and diligence when choosing a counterparty is one of the most common claims made by tax inspectors. To recognise company expenses under a transaction as undocumented, tax authorities only need to suspect its counterparty of dishonesty.

As part of tax risk identification and analysis, BGP Litigation lawyers check first-order counterparties for signs of unscrupulous organisations, analyse counterparty chains (second and subsequent order) to identify “fly-by-night” organisations, and assess tax risks in relations with disputed organisations, as well. If signs are identified of bad faith on the part of counterparties and presence of associated risks, the lawyers work out recommendations for further work with such counterparties and a roadmap for subsequent tax risk mitigation.

Services

Why BGP Litigation?
+

BGP Litigation lawyers have experience, including in tax authorities and BIG-4 companies, allowing them to perform, to a high standard, analytical procedures aimed at identifying tax risks associated with unscrupulous first- and subsequent-order counterparties.

It is worth turning to BGP Litigation lawyers if it is important for a company to maintain commercial prudence when dealing with counterparties, as well as to identify and mitigate potential tax risks in time. Timely identification of unscrupulous counterparties will allow the company to save significant labour and financial resources required for supporting an on-site tax audit and any subsequent appeal against it.

Practice

Team

Alexander Golikov
Partner, partner committee member, attorney — Tax Advise and Disputes
Pavel Kondukov
Partner, attorney — Tax Advise and Disputes
Denis Savin
Partner, attorney — Tax Advise and Disputes
Valentina Semenova
Counsel, attorney — Tax Advise and Disputes